<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
  <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">50</journal-id>
  <journal-id journal-id-type="short-title">grr</journal-id>
  <journal-id journal-id-type="doi">10.31703/grr</journal-id>
  <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Global Regional Review</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">grr</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group>
  <issn publication-format="print">2616-955X</issn>
  <issn publication-format="electronic">2663-7030</issn>
  <self-uri xlink:href="https://grrjournal.com"/>
  <publisher>
    <publisher-name>Humanity Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Pakistan</publisher-loc>
  </publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
  <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">391440</article-id>
  <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31703/grr.2019(IV-III).06</article-id>
  <article-id pub-id-type="other" specific-use="submission-id">1909</article-id>
  <article-version article-version-type="publisher">1.0</article-version>
  <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
      <subject>article</subject>
    </subj-group>
  </article-categories>
  <title-group>
    <article-title xml:lang="en">Passivization in Pashto and English: A Comparative Analysis</article-title>
  </title-group>
<contrib-group>
  <contrib contrib-type="author" seq="1" corresp="yes">
    <name>
      <surname>Ali</surname>
      <given-names>Akbar</given-names>
    </name>
    <email>akbar.iub@gmail.com</email>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing – original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing – original draft</role>
    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
    <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"/>
  </contrib>
  <contrib contrib-type="author" seq="2">
    <name>
      <surname>Anees</surname>
      <given-names>Muhammad</given-names>
    </name>
    <email>akbar.iub@gmail.com</email>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing – review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing – review &amp; editing</role>
    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/>
  </contrib>
  <contrib contrib-type="author" seq="3">
    <name>
      <surname>Khan</surname>
      <given-names>Bilal</given-names>
    </name>
    <email>akbar.iub@gmail.com</email>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing – review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing – review &amp; editing</role>
    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/>
  </contrib>
  <aff id="aff1">
    <label>1</label>
    <institution-wrap>
      <institution>Department of English, FATA University, Kohat</institution>
    </institution-wrap>
    <named-content content-type="author-role">Assistant Professor</named-content>
    <addr-line>KP</addr-line>
    <country>Pakistan</country>
  </aff>
  <aff id="aff2">
    <label>2</label>
    <institution-wrap>
      <institution>Department of English, FATA University, Kohat</institution>
    </institution-wrap>
    <named-content content-type="author-role">Lecturer</named-content>
    <addr-line>KP</addr-line>
    <country>Pakistan</country>
  </aff>
  <aff id="aff3">
    <label>3</label>
    <institution-wrap>
      <institution>Department of English, FATA University, Kohat</institution>
    </institution-wrap>
    <named-content content-type="author-role">Lecturer</named-content>
    <addr-line>KP</addr-line>
    <country>Pakistan</country>
  </aff>
</contrib-group>
<author-notes>
  <corresp id="cor1">Corresponding Author: Akbar Ali, Assistant Professor, Department of English,FATA University, Kohat, KP, Pakistan.. Email: <email>akbar.iub@gmail.com</email>. Contact: 3145557776</corresp>
<fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="fn-coi">
  <p>The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="ethics-statement" id="fn-ethics">
  <p>This study did not require formal ethics approval.</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="data-availability-statement" id="fn-data">
  <p>Data sharing is not applicable to this article.</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub" date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
  <day>30</day>
  <month>09</month>
  <year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
  <month>09</month>
  <year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="print">
  <day>16</day>
  <month>02</month>
  <year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
  <volume>4</volume>
  <issue>3</issue>
  <season>Summer</season>
  <fpage>45</fpage>
  <lpage>54</lpage>
  <history>
    <date date-type="accepted">
      <day>16</day>
      <month>02</month>
      <year>2022</year>
    </date>
  </history>
<funding-group>
  <funding-statement>
<p>The authors received no specific funding for this work.</p>
  </funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<permissions>
  <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
  <copyright-holder>Humanity Publications</copyright-holder>
  <license license-type="open-access" xml:lang="en" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
    <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</license-p>
  </license>
</permissions>
<self-uri content-type="text/html" xlink:href="https://grrjournal.com/article/Passivization-in-Pashto-and-English-A-Comparative-Analysis"/>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://grrjournal.com/pdf/grr/uq0AWzN86F.pdf"/>
<supplementary-material id="suppl-pdf" content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://grrjournal.com/pdf/grr/uq0AWzN86F.pdf">
  <label>PDF</label>
  <caption>
    <title>Full Text PDF</title>
  </caption>
</supplementary-material>
  <abstract>
    <p>The present research work intends to analyze and compare the sentence structures in English and Pashto Language. The researcher has focused mainly on the passivization process in this regard. The primary reason for the research is to highlight the similarities and differences between the passivization processes in both languages. Moreover, the researcher has delimited the study to tenses used in both the languages. The study follows qualitative method of research where the researcher has collected the data for the English passivization from the various grammar books while for the collection of data in the form of Pashto passive structures, the researcher has used test as research tools. The researcher has compared the passivization process in each tense between English and Pashto in the data analysis chapter. The study highlighted some similarities but many differences in the passivization process in English and Pashto languages.</p>
  </abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-keywords">
  <kwd>Passivization</kwd>
  <kwd>Passive in Pashto</kwd>
  <kwd>Pashto Language</kwd>
</kwd-group>
  <custom-meta-group>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>views</meta-name><meta-value>3292</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>downloads</meta-name><meta-value>2</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>html-views</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>google-scholar-citations</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>crossref-citations</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta>
  </custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="sec-1">
  <title>Introduction</title>
<p>Many scholars like Baugh (1993) and Crystal (2003) have authenticated the importance of language in human affairs. In addition to this, these scholars have also stated the importance of the English language in international communication. Any language, English or any other, has a definite structure through which the message is conveyed. In general there are two structures used in the languages of the world .e.g., Active and passive structures. The current study focuses the comparison in the passive structures of English and Pashto languages. Although passivization in English language has been explained by many grammarians and researchers the passivization in Pashto has not been compared with the various passive structures presented in English syntax. The study is thus a new attempt in the sense that it presents the comparison of, not only written Pashto passive structures, but also the spoken passive structures used by Yousafzai dialect with that of English passive structures. According to Rahman (2012) “Pashto has five major dialects and those are:(1) North-Eastern (Yousafzai) Dialect, (2) North-Western (Central) Dialect, (3) South-Eastern (Quetta) Dialect, (4) South-Western (Kandahar) Dialect, (5) Middle Tribal Dialect”. The researcher has selected Yousafzai dialect for the present educational study. In the various English dialects, the researcher has selected British dialect for the comparison with that of Pashto passivization. In this connection, the researcher will try to present the similarities and differences between the passive structures in English and Pashto. Language. Furthermore, the researcher will not only analyze the passivization rules of Pashto given in grammar books and other written texts but also of the real language used by L1 Pashto speakers in their day to day communication.</p><p><break/></p><p>Research Questions</p><p>What are the similarities and differences in passive structures in English and Pashto?</p><p>What changes are implied for converting active into passive in the Pashto language?</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-2">
  <title>Literature Review</title>
<p>Passivization</p><p>Passive in English is usually formed with the help of the auxiliary ‘be’ and the past participle form of the verb. The structure is mostly the following;</p><p>Object + be + verb (past participle) + by + subject</p><p>Cricket    is       played         by     me</p><p>But the usual condition in the formation of passive voice is that of the animate agent. The agent according to Yule (1996) is the performer of action mostly animate in nature as in the sentence ‘the boy plays football’ ‘the boy’ is agent. In addition to this, the ‘get passive’ according to Biber et al (1999) is quite a new addition in English language and very rarely used in formal occasions and writings.</p><p>The major difference in the transitive and intransitive is that intransitive takes an only indirect object and transitive verb takes direct as well as indirect objects. One formal rule of passivization is that the object associated with verb comes to the subject place in the passive voice and this direct association of a verb with the object is only found intransitivity.  For instance;</p><p>Smith writes a letter.</p><p>A letter is written by Smith.</p><p>Smith goes to school.</p><p>*School is gone by Smith.</p><p>Apart from intransitive verbs, passive structures cannot be formed for certain construction in the English language. These certain conditions or constructions are given below.</p><p>1. When the subject and object of a sentence are identical or in other words are reflexive pronoun is used as an object of a sentence, passive voice cannot be formed. For example the passive structure ‘john was known by himself’ is not recommendable. Haliday (1971) stated in his connection that we do not have passive in the case of reflexive object, it is only possible in the case of stressing on the reflexive agent.</p><p>2. The same rule is followed if a passive determiner precedes the object in the active structure. For example</p><p>Sally lost her bag.</p><p>Sally’s bag was lost by her.</p><p>This kind of passive is allowed in a very strict circumstance that is when the passive determiner ‘Her’ is stressed.</p><p>3. There are many stative verbs like loved, preferred, wanted, expected, etc that do not allow passivation in English language. For instance Smith wanted/expected Sally to play guitar (Huddleston, 1971).</p><p>4. The verb ‘have’ although it means to possess an inactive sentence cannot be changed into passive even if ‘do’ is used as an auxiliary verb. For example ‘Dinner is had by me’ or ‘how much money is had by John’ are not possible structures in English language.</p><p>5. Prepositional verbs are mostly used in active structures rather than passive structures. According to Quirk et al (1974) the constraints can be of two types. The first is the abstract use of the preposition followed by verb as ‘arrived at the decision’. The second type is that the use of preposition in concrete context as ‘went into the hall’. These types of constructions with prepositional verbs are known as Pseudo passive as well. The examples are;</p><p>The decision has not been arrived at abstract</p><p>Went into the hall, concrete</p><p>Duskova (1999) adds in this connection that if the use of the preposition is not adverbial or in another case the prepositional verb is transitive like ‘laughed at’, ‘look into’ etc. with such verbs passivation is possible.</p><p>Huddleston (1971) presents another view of adverbial preposition and he further states that if the object of the prepositional verb is time, duration or manner then passive is not formed as;</p><p>*Enthusiasm was sung with.</p><p>*The first day of the term was eloped on.</p><p>He makes one distinction in this regard by saying that instrumental prepositional verbs can be changed into the passive voice as;</p><p>That bed has not been slept in.</p><p>This blade has already been shaved twice.</p><p>Apart from the discussion presented above, there are many other discussions related to passive constructions like the use of direct versus indirect objects in the passive, the use of active agents and the bare passive but the researcher has restricted the review to the discussion presented above. The reason is that the passive in English has been compared with that of the passivation in Pashto and Pashto passive has not been discussed and explained into so much detail. In addition to this the scope of the study is to compare the passivation in Pashto and English in the various tenses and aspects of Pashto and English, thus the researcher has delimited the study to the similarities and differences in Pashto and English passivization in the tense systems of these two languages.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-3">
  <title>Research Methodology</title>
<p>The study is qualitative in nature that focuses on the passivization in Pashto and English language. Qualitative research stands for the description, analysis, explanation of the descriptive data. The data in the qualitative researches are usually in the descriptive form while the data in the quantitative studies is in numerical form. In the current study, the data is in descriptive form .i.e. sentences and utterances of Pashto and English languages and it is analyzed in descriptive way in the data analysis, thus the research is purely qualitative.</p><p><break/></p><p>Population and Sample of the Study</p><p>The L1 Pashto speakers who use the Yousafzai dialect in Peshawar and Mardan regions serve as the target population of the study. The current population consists of various categories in connection to their ages, education, and gender, therefore the researcher has followed purposive sampling technique in the selection of the representative participants from the population.</p><p>The age of the participants selected as samples is between 23 to 24 years. Only male speakers are selected as a sample for the study. Their educational level is Master in English and they are L1 Pashto speakers of district Peshawar. Thus, the researcher has selected 50 participants using the Yousafzai dialect of Pashto.</p><p><break/></p><p>Data Collection Tools</p><p>The researcher has used tests for data collection.</p><p><break/></p><p>Test</p><p>The researcher has used another tool test for data collection. This time the whole focus was the collection of the passive structure for the tenses and aspects of Pashto language. The test contained four to five sentences of Pashto in each tense and aspects. The respondents were asked to provide the passive for the given active structures in the test.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-4">
  <title>Analysis</title>
<p>Passivization Present Simple and Imperfective tenses</p><p>In English passives are formed in the present indefinite, present progressive and present perfect tenses where the transitive verbs are used whereas in Pashto there are two tenses in relation to present tense as present imperfective and present perfective tenses. (Tagey and Rboson 1996) (Mackenzie 1987) (Shafeev 1964).</p><p>Mung cricket kao			we play cricket and we are playing cricket.</p><p>We cricket play</p><p>The structure in this tense contains the subject in the start followed by an object and then verb is used. The verb agrees to the subject in number and person as the following table shows;</p><p>Mung kao	we do</p><p>Ze kom		I do</p><p>Agha kae	he/she does</p><p>Aghe kawe/kae	they do</p><p>Te kai		you (sing) do</p><p>Taso kawai	you (plural) do</p><p>Alak/alakan kae	the boy/ boys does/do</p><p>Negative is formed with the help of ‘na’ before the verb and interrogative is usually formed with stress on subject or verb.</p><p>The English passive contains the object in the start then is/am/are according to the Subject and past participle and then the agent in the end. There are certain rules applied almost in the passivization in almost every tense. At first the subject goes to the object place and the object of the sentence goes to the subject place. The other rule is after the “be” form of verb which is ‘is, am, and are’ in this tense is used, “is” with singular subject, “am” with “I” and “are” with plural subject. Then the next rule is the past participle verb that is used in every tense passivation in English and the last rule is the verb is either followed by ‘by’ or ‘to’ if the agent is used. The example is given below.</p><p>Active		Subject		verb		object</p><p>He 		plays 		cricket</p><p>Passive	object 		be verb		past participle		by/to	Agent			cricket 		is		played			by	him</p><p>The Pashto passive in present imperfective tense follows the same rule of subject and object substitution just like the English language and thus the Pashto passive in this tense starts with the object that is followed by the subject of the sentence. In Pashto language ‘na’ is used as instrumental element before the verb where in English ‘by’ is used after the verb. In contrast to past participle of English passive, in Pashto an inflection ‘e’ is added to the verb that ends with ‘kege’. But mostly the Pashto passive in this tense is used without the agent. The Pashto passive in present imperfective tense is given below.</p><p>Object		Subject		by/to		verb</p><p>Rotai		mung		na		khwrarle kege</p><p>Alakn		aghe		na		wahale kege</p><p>TV		                                                katale kege		(agentless)</p><p><break/></p><p>Passivization Present Perfect Tense and Present Perfective Tense</p><p>The passive in English presents perfect tense contains the past participle verb with “has been” and “have been” according to the singular and plural subjects respectively. The rest of the rules of object and subject replacement, as well as the insertion of “by” in passive, is applied in the same way as the following structure shows.</p><p>Active He has played cricket</p><p>Passive Cricket has been played by him or cricket has been played.</p><p>Active They have eaten the meal</p><p>Passive The meal has been eaten by them</p><p>Active The teacher has beaten the boys</p><p>Passive The boys have been beaten by the teacher.</p><p>On the other hand the passivization in Pashto present perfective tense also follows the same rules of passivization followed in the Pashto present imperfective in connection to the object-subject replacement and the insertion of the “by” word “na” after the subject. But the verb endings are different according to the use of the object. Moreover, the usual case is, in Pashto language the passive in this tense is formed without the agent as;</p><p>Active						Active</p><p>The meal has been eaten.			The meal has been eaten by him.</p><p>Passive					Passive</p><p>Rotai okhware shwa		instead 	rotai aghe na okhware shwa</p><p>The inflections “shwa”, “shwe” and “sho” after the verb are the indicators of the Pashto present perfective passive indicators. The structures with singular and plural masculine objects contain “sho” after the verb while the singular feminine object structure contains “shwa” and the plural feminine object structure contains “shwe” after the verbs in passive structure. For instance;</p><p>Boy/boys have been punished</p><p>Alak/alakan owakhale sho</p><p>The girl has been punished.</p><p>Jinai owakhale shwa</p><p>The girls have been punished</p><p>Jinakai owakhale shwe</p><p><break/></p><p>Passivization in Past Indefinite and Imperfective tenses</p><p>The English passive in past indefinite is formed by the use of “was” and “were” with singular and plural subjects respectively with past participle form. The other rules of subject-object replacement and the use of “by” are applied the same may as in the other tenses. The following sentences show how active structure is changed into passive in past indefinite tense.</p><p>Active		We play cricket.</p><p>Passive	Cricket was played by us.</p><p>Active		He ate the meal.</p><p>Passive	The meal was eaten by him.</p><p>The Pashto passive in past indefinite follows the same rules as that of English in the case of subject and object movement. But the native speakers of Pashto language especially the Yousafzai dialect prefer to use agentless passive. The other difference in the comparison of English and Pashto is that there are some sentences of which passive is not formed and used in Pashto language. The following instances will show the comparison between English and Pashto passive in past indefinite and imperfective tenses.</p><p>Active 		He played cricket</p><p>Passive	Cricket was played by him.</p><p>Active		Aghe   cricket kare de</p><p>Passive	*Cricket aghe na shawe de</p><p>This type of passive is not used by L1 Pashto speakers. In comparison to this the following passive structures are used.</p><p>Active 		We ate the meal.</p><p>Passive	The meal was eaten by us.</p><p>Active		Mung rotai khwarale da.</p><p>Passive 	Rotai mung na khwarale shawe da.</p><p>The usual case in Pashto is that the passive subject is not used as “rotai khwarale shawe da”.</p><p><break/></p><p>Passivization in Past Progressive Tenses</p><p>The passive of past continuous in English is formed through “was/were”, being and participle forms.</p><p>Cricket was being played by us.</p><p>The boys were beaten by him.</p><p>The participant produced the following structure of past progressive or imperfective.</p><p>Cricket Kedo / Cricket aghe na Kedo</p><p>Rotai khwarale keda / Rotai mung na khwaral keda</p><p>Largi matawle kedal / jinakai wahale kede.</p><p>The masculine singular object goes with “kedo” in the end while the other hand the plural objects goes with “kedal” in Masculine case with “kedo” in feminine case.</p><p><break/></p><p>Passivization in Past Perfect and Past Perfective Tense</p><p>The English passive is formed through the use of had been and past participle form of the verb after the subject goes to the object place and vice versa as:</p><p>Cricket had been played by us.</p><p>The meal had been eaten by him.</p><p>On the other hand the Pashto passive of past perfective is the following.</p><p>Cricket mung na shawe o</p><p>Rotai aghe na khawarale shawe wa</p><p>Cricket shawe o           (without subject)</p><p>Rotai khawarale shawe wa                  (do)In the case of Pashto the additional auxiliary “shawe” is added before the perfective auxiliary “o” or “wa” and the subject is followed by the object but as the last example showed that usually passive structures are being used by Pashto speakers in their day to day communication with the agent.</p><p><break/></p><p>Passivization in Future Indefinite and Future Imperfective Tenses</p><p>The English future indefinite is formed through the use of will and past form of verb. For negative “not” is used after the auxiliary while for interrogative the auxiliary comes before the subject as:</p><p>We will play cricket</p><p>We will not play cricket</p><p>Will we play cricket?</p><p>The Pashto imperfective aspect, in this case, is formed with the help of “ba” auxiliary before the object while the inflections are according to the following table.</p><p>I “m” we “o” he/ she /it/ the “e”</p><p>You (singular) “ai” you/plural “ai”</p><p>Mung ba cricket kao</p><p>Aghe ba rotai khwree</p><p>Taso ba Alakan Wahay.</p><p>The passive of English future indefinite is formed with the help of will be and Participle form as.</p><p>The meal will be eaten by him.</p><p>In Pashto the “ba” future auxiliary comes after the object while the verb is followed by “kege”as;</p><p>Rotai ba aghe na khwarale kege.</p><p>Cricket ba mung na kege.</p><p>Alakan ba wahale kege.</p><p><break/></p><p>Future Perfect and Future Perfective Tense</p><p>Usually passive of future perfect tense in English and Pashto is not commonly used but the structure is given below.</p><p>The meal will have been eaten by us.</p><p>The Pashto passive for future perfective contain the “ba” auxiliary after the subject followed and then “shawe” is inserted between the verb and “wee/ee”</p><p>Rotai ba khwarale shawe wee</p><p>Cricket ba shawe wee</p><p>But the subject is not used in this structure as the use of the subject changes the sense of the passive, in some case as;</p><p>Aghe na ba kursai mata shawe wee</p><p>And</p><p>Aghe na ba rotai khwarale shawe wee</p><p>The first instance shows the passive voice where the subject is not responsible for the action while the second case presents the sense that the meal was finished before he reached.</p><p><break/></p><p>Imperative Passive in Pashto and English.</p><p>Imperative sentences are those sentences that express a command, a wish or a request. The researcher has taken into account the imperative that expresses a command. The structure of English imperative structure in the active voice starts with the base form of verb followed by the noun phrase as;</p><p>Open the door.</p><p>Do it.</p><p>Shut the window.</p><p>On the contrary, the passive structure of imperative in English possesses “let” followed by the object and then past participle verb as:</p><p>Let the door be opened.</p><p>Let it be done.</p><p>Let the window be shut.</p><p>Imperative structures are also used extensively by L1 Pashto speakers in their language using mostly the active voice. This kind of structure in Pashto usually contains a noun followed by a verb with “ka” or without “ka” morpheme. For instance;</p><p>Darwaza kolao ka</p><p>Kar oka</p><p>Kerkai band aka</p><p>The Pashto imperative passive, on the other hand, contains the object in the start of the structure followed by auxiliary “de” and then the verb having “e” inflection plus”shee” as suffix.</p><p>Darwaza de banda kare shee</p><p>Kar de okre shee</p><p>Kerkai de banda kre shee</p><p>But the L1 Pashto speakers very rarely use the imperative passive in their day to day communication. They mostly use active voice for expressing orders in the Pashto language. In addition to this, Pashto imperative passive is sometimes used sarcastically by the Pashto language users as the participants in the interviews reported.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-5">
  <title>Research Findings</title>
<p>The analysis has shown how far the passivation process is similar; and how much this process is different in English and Pashto languages. After the detailed analysis the researcher has come to the following conclusion:</p><p>1. The researcher has found out differences in the tenses and aspects between English and Pashto language and as a result of the difference in tense and aspect formation, there are differences in the passivation process of English and Pashto languages. The following list shows the differences in the tense and aspects of English and Pashto language.</p><p>Present indefinite tense				present imperfective tense</p><p>Present continuous tense</p><p>Present perfect tense				present perfective tense</p><p>Past indefinite tense 				past imperfective tense</p><p>Past continuous tense				past progressive tense</p><p>Past perfect tense				past perfective tense</p><p>Future indefinite tense				future imperfective tense</p><p>Future continuous tense</p><p>Future perfect tense				future perfective tense</p><p>Tegey and Roboson (1996), as well as Penzell (1995), have presented these tense and aspects of Pashto language but the only difference is that of the Yousafzai dialect speakers who produced past progressive aspect that is totally different from the past imperfective aspect in Pashto language as;</p><p>Ma rotai khwarale da			past simple</p><p>Ma rotai khwara			past progressive</p><p>Ma rotai khwarale wa			past perfective</p><p>2. In English language passive structures are used with or without passive agents normally as ‘the snake was killed’ and ‘the snake was killed by the boy’. On the other hand the researcher has noticed that in Pashto language passive structures are usually used without the agents in the end as ‘rotai okheare shwa’ sabaq yadsho’ etc and very rarely agents are used in the passive constructions.</p><p>3. The structure of passive voice like the active structures is different in Pashto and English. Object is followed by verb and then the subject is used in the English passive while object is followed by the subject and then the verb is used in Pashto passive.</p><p>The chair 	is broken by 		him</p><p>Object		verb			subject</p><p>Kursai		aghena		            matashwa</p><p>Object 		subject			verb</p><p>Thus the rule in English passive is that the subject goes to the place of the object and vice versa in English language but in Pashto the rule is different from that of English. In Pashto although the subject and object change their places but again the subject is directly used after the object in the passive as the subject is used just before the object in active structure.</p><p>4. In English passive another rule is that the verb is followed by ‘by’ or ‘to’ before the passive agent as ‘played by Smith’ or ‘married to him’. On the other hand an additional word just like ‘by’ in English passive is used in Pashto passive and that is “na”. But the difference is that “na” is used before the verb and not after the verb like English as ‘aghe na khwarle shawe da’. In both English and Pashto “by” or “na” are not used in agentless passives.</p><p>5. English passive structure contains a past participle verb in all the tenses and aspects. On the other hand in Pashto the form of the verb is changed in the passive structure according to tenses and aspects as the following table shows.</p><p>Present 		rotai khwarale kege</p><p>Past 			rotai khwarale shawe da</p><p>Future			rotai ba khwarale kege</p><p>6. One of the important findings of the study is the imperative passive is not only formed in English language but also in Pashto language and in both languages such as passives are used by the speakers in various contexts.</p><p>7. The structure of imperative passive in English starts with “let” followed by the subject and then past participle verb is used with be a form of verb. In comparison to this the structure of the Pashto passive contains the subject as the first word followed by verb that ends with ‘she’, for instance;</p><p>English		Let the door be opened</p><p>Pashto		Dwrawaza de bandakre she</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-6">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
<p>The study intended to compare the passivization process in Pashto language with that of the English language where the primary reason of the research was to find out the differences and similarities in the passivization process between these two languages. The main focus was given to the tenses and aspects used in these two languages and the imperative structures. The data was collected from the native speakers of Pashto language for the analysis of Pashto passivization while the data for the analysis of passive structures were collected from secondary sources .i.e. grammar books. The researcher has not only explained the passivization process in each tense of Pashto but also has compared the process of passivization of Pashto with English. Thus the study has highlighted that there are some similarities but many differences in the passivization process of Pashto and English.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<fn-group content-type="conflict-of-interest">
  <title>Conflict of Interest</title>
  <fn fn-type="conflict">
<p>The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.</p>
  </fn>
</fn-group>
<fn-group content-type="ethics-statement">
  <title>Ethics Statement</title>
  <fn fn-type="ethics">
<p>This study did not require formal ethics approval.</p>
  </fn>
</fn-group>
<fn-group content-type="data-availability">
  <title>Data Availability</title>
  <fn fn-type="data-availability-statement">
<p>Data sharing is not applicable to this article.</p>
  </fn>
</fn-group>
<app-group>
  <app id="app-suppl">
    <title>Supplementary Materials</title>
<supplementary-material id="suppl-pdf" content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://grrjournal.com/pdf/grr/uq0AWzN86F.pdf">
  <label>PDF</label>
  <caption>
    <title>Full Text PDF</title>
  </caption>
</supplementary-material>
  </app>
</app-group>
<ref-list>
  <title>References</title>
<ref id="Barber">
  <label>1</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Barber, C.L</person-group>
    <year>1982</year>
    Barber, C.L. (1982).
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Baugh">
  <label>2</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Baugh. A. C</person-group>
    <year>1993</year>
    <article-title>. &apos;A history of the English language&apos;</article-title>
    <source>London and New York: Fourth Edition. Rutledge and Kegan Paul Press</source>
    <page-range>aul</page-range>
    Baugh. A. C. (1993). &apos;A history of the English language&apos;. London and New York: Fourth Edition. Rutledge and Kegan Paul Press.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Biber">
  <label>3</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Biber, D., &amp; Conrad, S</person-group>
    <year>1999</year>
    <article-title>. Lexical bundles in conversation and academic prose</article-title>
    <source>Language and Computers</source>
    <volume>26</volume>
    <fpage>181</fpage>
    <lpage>190</lpage>
    Biber, D., &amp; Conrad, S. (1999). Lexical bundles in conversation and academic prose. Language and Computers, 26, 181-190.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Crystal">
  <label>4</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Crystal, D</person-group>
    <year>2003</year>
    <article-title>. English as a global language (2nd ed.)</article-title>
    <source>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</source>
    <page-range>ress</page-range>
    Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Duskova">
  <label>5</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Duskova, L</person-group>
    <year>1999</year>
    <article-title>. Studies in the English Language</article-title>
    <source>Part2. Praha: Karolinum</source>
    <fpage>2</fpage>
    Duskova, L. (1999). Studies in the English Language. Part2. Praha: Karolinum.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Dyrer">
  <label>6</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Dyrer, M.S</person-group>
    <year>2005</year>
    <article-title>. Relationship between the order of object and verb and the order of adjective and noun</article-title>
    <source>In Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D. and Comrie, B., eds., World Atlas of Languages Structures. 394-397. Oxford University Press</source>
    <page-range>ress</page-range>
    Dyrer, M.S. (2005). Relationship between the order of object and verb and the order of adjective and noun. In Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D. and Comrie, B., eds., World Atlas of Languages Structures. 394-397. Oxford University Press.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Huddleston">
  <label>7</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Huddleston, R</person-group>
    <year>1971</year>
    <article-title>. The sentence in written English</article-title>
    <source>Cambridge: CUP</source>
    Huddleston, R. (1971). The sentence in written English. Cambridge: CUP.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Penzle">
  <label>8</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Penzle, H</person-group>
    <year>1955</year>
    <article-title>. A Grammar of Pashto</article-title>
    <source>Washington, D.C: American Council of Learned Society, Ishi Press International</source>
    <page-range>enzle</page-range>
    Penzle, H. (1955). A Grammar of Pashto. Washington, D.C: American Council of Learned Society, Ishi Press International.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Quirk">
  <label>9</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Quirk, R. et al</person-group>
    <year>1974</year>
    <article-title>A grammar of contemporary English</article-title>
    <source>Harlow: Longman</source>
    Quirk, R. et al. (1974) A grammar of contemporary English. Harlow: Longman.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Rahman">
  <label>11</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Rahman, G</person-group>
    <year>2012</year>
    <article-title>. Ã¢Â€Â˜English Problematic Consonants for Pashto Speakers&apos;</article-title>
    <source>Academic A Research International</source>
    <page-range>roblematic</page-range>
    Rahman, G. (2012). Ã¢Â€Â˜English Problematic Consonants for Pashto Speakers&apos;. Academic A Research International.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Raverty">
  <label>12</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Raverty, M. H</person-group>
    <year>1859</year>
    <article-title>. The Grammar of Pashto</article-title>
    <source>Calcutta: Newman and Co</source>
    <page-range>ashto</page-range>
    Raverty, M. H. (1859). The Grammar of Pashto. Calcutta: Newman and Co.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="SadiqUllah">
  <label>13</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">SadiqUllah.R</person-group>
    <year>1994</year>
    <source>Ã¢Â€Â˜Grammar of Pashto&apos;.University Book Agency Press.Peshawar</source>
    <page-range>ashto</page-range>
    SadiqUllah.R. (1994) Ã¢Â€Â˜Grammar of Pashto&apos;.University Book Agency Press.Peshawar.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Shafeev">
  <label>14</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Shafeev, D. A</person-group>
    <year>1964</year>
    <article-title>. A Short Grammatical Outline of Pashto</article-title>
    <source>Herbert H. Paper (traed.). Bloomington: Indiana University; and The Hague: Mouton and Co</source>
    <page-range>ashto</page-range>
    Shafeev, D. A. (1964). A Short Grammatical Outline of Pashto. Herbert H. Paper (traed.). Bloomington: Indiana University; and The Hague: Mouton and Co.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Tallerman">
  <label>15</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Tallerman, M</person-group>
    <year>2005</year>
    <article-title>. Understanding Syntax (2nd ed) Hodder Arnold</article-title>
    <source>London</source>
    Tallerman, M. (2005). Understanding Syntax (2nd ed) Hodder Arnold. London
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Tegey">
  <label>16</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Tegey, H, Robson,. Barbara</person-group>
    <year>1996</year>
    <article-title>. A Reference Grammar of Pashto (PDF)</article-title>
    <source>Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics</source>
    <page-range>ashto</page-range>
    Tegey, H, Robson,. Barbara. (1996). A Reference Grammar of Pashto (PDF). Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>