Teachers' Perceptions about the Use of Information Communication Technologies (ICTs) in Second Language Learning at Higher Secondary Level
This research is aimed at investigating the perceptions of English language teachers pertaining to the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in second language learning. The availability of ICT resources in institutions and their application by the teachers in English Language Teaching (ELT) class was also kept in focus in this study. The use of technology has undoubtedly brought favorable results in our life. It speeds up the transfer of information and permits faster processes as well as provides a pleasant learning atmosphere. This study was carried out at a higher secondary level comprising 60 respondents from public and private institutions in the city of Multan (Punjab), Pakistan. The measurement tool questionnaire was employed for the collection of data. The development of the questionnaire was done by the researchers according to the teaching level and background of the respondents. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS. The results showed that ICT and its use in L2 learning are beneficial and may prove to be an aid in the results.It was also explored that a fully dedicated ICT apparatus is required for English language teaching and learning in educational institutions. Moreover, the training of teaching faculty in educational institutions is needed for the better application of ICTs in language teaching.
-
Land Reforms, Goals, Land Reforms Measures, Land Distribution, South Africa and Zimbabwe
-
(1) Rehan Muhammad
Lecturer, Department of English, Emerson University Multan, Punjab, Pakistan.
(2) Shahid Nawaz
Assistant Professor, Department of English Linguistics, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan
(3) Muhammad Hammad Hussain Shah
PhD Scholar in English Linguistics, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan
- Almekhlafi, A. G. (2006). Effectiveness of interactive multimedia environment on language acquisition skills of 6th grade students in the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Instructional Media, 33(4), 427-442.
- Benson, P. (2013). Teaching and researching: Autonomy in language learning. Routledge: Routledge Publications. Crystal, D. (2012). English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Frigaard, A. (2002). Does the Computer Lab Improve Student Performance on Vocabulary, Grammar, and Listening Comprehension?
- Hawkins, R. (2002). Ten lessons for ICT and education in the developing world.
- Hirvela, A. (2007). Computer-mediated communication and the linking of students, text, and author on an ESL writing course listserv. Computers and Composition, 24(1), 36-55
- Lam, Y., & Lawrence, G. (2002). Teacher-student role redefinition during a computer-based second language project: Are computers catalysts for empowering change? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(3), 295-315.
- Lee, J., Park, G. W., & Kim, Y. H. (2012). Method for transmitting information for inter-radio access technology handover: Google Patents
- Levin, T., & Wadman, R. (2006a). Listening to students' voices on learning with information technologies in a rich technology-based classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(3), 281-317.
- Levin, T., & Wadman, R. (2006b). Teachers' beliefs and practices in technology-based classrooms: A developmental view. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(2), 157-181.
- Maki, C. (2008). Information and Communication Technology for Administration and Management for secondary schools in Cyprus. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4(3), 18- 20.
- Mangesi, J. (2010). A comparative study of approaches to ICT policy formulation and implementation in Ghana and South Africa
- Mansor, N. (2007). Collaborative learning via email discussion: strategies for ESL writing classroom. The Internet TESL Journal, 13(3).
- Miner, T. (2004). Using technology to enhance learning: Instructor-or Student-Moderated Discussion Boards: Which are more effective.
- Preston, C., Cox, M., & Cox, K. (2000). Teachers as innovators: an evaluation of the motivation of teachers to use Information and Communications Technology: MirandaNet.
- Restaino, S. R., Payne, D. M., Baker, J. T., Andrews, J. R., Teare, S. W., Gilbreath, G. C., Gonglewski, J. D. (2003). Liquid crystal technology for adaptive optics: an update. Paper presented at the Liquid Crystal Materials, Devices, and Applications IX.
- Rivers, W. M. (2018). Teaching foreign-language skills: University of Chicago Press
- Rumpagaporn, M. W. (2007). Students' critical thinking skills, attitudes to ICT and perceptions of ICT classroom learning environments under the ICT schools pilot project in Thailand.
- Saunders, G., & Pincas, A. (2004). Student attitudes towards information and communication technologies in teaching and learning in the UK. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 1(8).
- Schiller, J., & Voisard, A. (2004). Location-based services: Elsevier.
- Schofield, J. W., & Davidson, A. L. (2003). The impact of Internet use on relationships between teachers and students. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 10(1), 62-79.
- Schreyer, P. (2000). The contribution of information and communication technology to output growth.
- Simonsson, M. (2004). Technology use of Hispanic bilingual teachers: A function of their beliefs, attitudes and perceptions on peer technology use in the classroom. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31(3), 257.
- Speier, C., Morris, M. G., & Briggs, C. M. (1995). Attitudes toward computers: The impact on performance. Paper presented at the Association for Information Systems Americas Conference held in Indianapolis, Indiana.
- Warschauer, M., & Kern, R. (2000). Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice: Cambridge University press.
- Woodrow, J. E. (1991). Teachers' perceptions of computer needs. Journal of research on computing in education, 23(4), 475-496.
- Yunus, M. M. (2007). Malaysian ESL teachers' use of ICT in their classrooms: expectations and realities. ReCALL, 19(1), 79-95.
- Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American educational research journal, 40(4), 807-840.
Cite this article
-
APA : Muhammad, R., Nawaz, S., & Shah, M. H. H. (2021). Teachers' Perceptions about the Use of Information Communication Technologies (ICTs) in Second Language Learning at Higher Secondary Level. Global Regional Review, VI(II), 178-185. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2021(VI-II).21
-
CHICAGO : Muhammad, Rehan, Shahid Nawaz, and Muhammad Hammad Hussain Shah. 2021. "Teachers' Perceptions about the Use of Information Communication Technologies (ICTs) in Second Language Learning at Higher Secondary Level." Global Regional Review, VI (II): 178-185 doi: 10.31703/grr.2021(VI-II).21
-
HARVARD : MUHAMMAD, R., NAWAZ, S. & SHAH, M. H. H. 2021. Teachers' Perceptions about the Use of Information Communication Technologies (ICTs) in Second Language Learning at Higher Secondary Level. Global Regional Review, VI, 178-185.
-
MHRA : Muhammad, Rehan, Shahid Nawaz, and Muhammad Hammad Hussain Shah. 2021. "Teachers' Perceptions about the Use of Information Communication Technologies (ICTs) in Second Language Learning at Higher Secondary Level." Global Regional Review, VI: 178-185
-
MLA : Muhammad, Rehan, Shahid Nawaz, and Muhammad Hammad Hussain Shah. "Teachers' Perceptions about the Use of Information Communication Technologies (ICTs) in Second Language Learning at Higher Secondary Level." Global Regional Review, VI.II (2021): 178-185 Print.
-
OXFORD : Muhammad, Rehan, Nawaz, Shahid, and Shah, Muhammad Hammad Hussain (2021), "Teachers' Perceptions about the Use of Information Communication Technologies (ICTs) in Second Language Learning at Higher Secondary Level", Global Regional Review, VI (II), 178-185
-
TURABIAN : Muhammad, Rehan, Shahid Nawaz, and Muhammad Hammad Hussain Shah. "Teachers' Perceptions about the Use of Information Communication Technologies (ICTs) in Second Language Learning at Higher Secondary Level." Global Regional Review VI, no. II (2021): 178-185. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2021(VI-II).21